Processing math: 83%

Friday, November 27, 2015

Illustration of the Dyson Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

I define the Dyson Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process as dXt=αXtdt+Hdt with α>0 and H a random matrix from the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble of n×n Hermitian matrices. The eigenvalues λi(t) of Xt then have the following dynamics dλi=αλidt+ji1λiλjdt+dBi where B1,,Bn are independent Brownian processes. In this post I illustrate the process (2) numerically.

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Illustration of Dyson Brownian Motion

The Dyson Brownian motion is defined as Xt+dt=Xt+Hdt with H a random matrix from the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble of n×n Hermitian matrices. It is then well-known that the dynamics of the eigenvalues λi(t) of Xt is described by the process dλi=ji1λiλjdt+dBi where B1,,Bn are independent Brownian processes. In this post I illustrate the process (4) numerically.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Proof of a determinantal integration formula

While reading about random matrices I encountered the following formula in a blog post by Terence Tao.

If K(x,y) is such that
  1. dx K(x,x)=α 
  2. dy K(x,y)K(y,z)=K(x,z)
then dxn+1det For simplicity I have written \int instead of \int_{\mathbb{R}} . This formula is used when calculating n-point functions in the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE). Tao gives a short proof of \eqref{eq:20151118a} based on induction and the Laplace expansion of determinants. In this post, I give a proof using integration over Grassmann variables. The reason I am interested in this alternative proof is that I want to compress the calculation of n-point functions in the GUE as much as possible.

Sunday, November 15, 2015

Spectral Density in the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble

In this post I perform numerical experiments on the spectral density in the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE).

Thursday, November 12, 2015

Proof of the Christoffel–Darboux formula without induction

In this post I prove the Christoffel–Darboux formula without using induction. It seems that often the Christoffel–Darboux formula is proved with induction. However, I find that the proof with induction does not give insight why the Christoffel–Darboux formula is correct. I found the proof below in a paper by Barry Simon.