If f is a function with support I⊆R, then for z∈C−I, the Stieltjes transformation S(z) is
S(z)=∫+∞−∞f(t)t−zdt The inverse of the Stieltjes transformation is f(z)=limϵ>→0S(z+iϵ)−S(z−iϵ)2πi I deduce (2) with a sloppy calculation: S(z+iϵ)−S(z−iϵ)=2iϵ∫+∞−∞f(t)dt1(t−z)2+ϵ2 Because limϵ>→0ϵx2+ϵ2=πδ(x) I get limϵ>→0(S(z+iϵ)−S(z−iϵ))=2i∫+∞−∞f(t)dt πδ(t−z)=2iπf(z)
It seems that the Stieltjes transformation is often used in probability theory. I therefore take the examples from probability theory. Example 1
The simplest probability distribution is the uniform distribution. Thus I take f(t)=1 if t∈[0,a] and f(t)=0 otherwise. Then one can calculate that S(z)=log(z−az)def=Log(z−a)−Logz with Log the logarithm with branch cut on ]−∞,0] and Log1=0. With this definition, log(z−az) has a branch cut on the interval [0,a]. If one moves from the lower half plane over the branch cut to the upper half plane, the value of log(z−az) jumps with the amount 2πi.
Here is a graph of the function log(z−az)
![]() |
Re(log(z−az)) for a=1 |
![]() |
Im(log(z−az)) for a=1 |
- If z∉[0,a], then S(z) is continuous, thus limϵ>→0(S(z+iϵ)−S(z−iϵ))=0
- If z∈[0,a], then limϵ>→0(S(z+iϵ)−S(z−iϵ))=2πi
Example 2
The second example is motivated by Wigner's semicircle distribution from random matrix theory. Take f(t)=√1−t2 if t∈[−1,1] and f(t)=0 otherwise. By integrating the contour integral around the branch cut, one can calculate that S(z)=∫1−1√1−t2t−zdt=π(√z−1√z+1−z) Here, in the right hand side, the complex square root √z is defined with branch cut on the negative real axis. It then follows that √z−1√z+1 has a branch cut on [−1,1]. Also, one can see that if x∈[−1,1] and z=x+iϵ with ϵ>0, then √z2−1=i√1−x2.
Here is a graph of the function √z−1√z+1−z
![]() |
Re(√z−1√z+1−z) |
![]() |
Im(√z−1√z+1−z) |
- If z∉[−1,1], then S(z) is continuous, thus limϵ>→0(S(z+iϵ)−S(z−iϵ))=0
- If z∈[−1,1], then limϵ>→0(S(z+iϵ)−S(z−iϵ))=π(i√1−x2−(−i)√1−x2)=2πi√1−x2
Remark: I decided to write this post because the Stieltjes transformation is used in random matrix theory. I wanted therefore to understand the Stieltjes transformation on some easy examples.
No comments:
Post a Comment